University of Arizona’s Presidential Search: Runner-Up Emerges as Faculty Favorite

The University of Arizona faces a pivotal moment as the Arizona Board of Regents prepares to appoint its next president. The board has chosen Dr. Robert C. Robbins, currently CEO of Texas Medical Center, over rival candidate Sethuraman “Panch” Panchanathan of ASU. This decision appears to contrast with the preferences expressed by numerous faculty members.

Internal documents reveal that faculty generated significant support for Panchanathan, citing his strong commitment to Arizona, extensive academic experience, and collaborative spirit. However, a minority of donors communicated a clear preference for Robbins, emphasizing his extensive background in cardiology and leadership at Stanford. These insights came to light following a public records request from the Arizona Daily Star, illuminating the mixed sentiments surrounding the presidential search.

Richard Fink, a donor, strongly endorsed Robbins, highlighting the university’s need for decisive leadership at a critical juncture. He assessed Robbins as having the necessary skills and background crucial for steering the institution forward. In contrast, the sentiment among faculty was largely positive towards both finalists but leaned toward Panchanathan for his proven abilities in innovation and his dedication to educational principles.

Lynn Nadel, UA faculty chair and member of the search committee, noted that while both candidates were highly regarded, feedback revealed a distinct preference for Panchanathan. He described the finalist’s qualities as open-minded and team-oriented and acknowledged his notable track record in academia.

Conversely, some concerns were raised regarding the leadership styles and backgrounds of both candidates. Feedback indicated apprehension that Panchanathan might emulate ASU President Michael Crow’s approach, which some faculty viewed as overly centralizing. Concerns about Robbins focused on his perceived lack of familiarity with non-medical university sectors, potentially prioritizing the medical campus at the expense of broader institutional needs.

As the board prepares to finalize Robbins’ contract during its meeting on April 7, all eyes will be on his approach to inclusivity and collaboration across the university’s varied departments. In addressing criticism, Robbins expressed eagerness to engage with faculty and senior leadership, emphasizing the importance of every academic division’s contribution to the university’s success.

Nadel reassured the board that while faculty might exhibit some reservations, both finalists possess commendable scholarly achievements. Ultimately, he expressed optimism that the new president could foster a collaborative and successful environment by making sound decisions for the university’s future.

For further inquiries, contact reporter Carol Ann Alaimo at 573-413-8 or calaimo@tucson.com. Follow on Twitter: @StarHigherEd.