AZ Lawmaker Advocates for More Roles, Shedding Light on Part-Time Legislative Reality

By Matthew Holloway |

Arizona Representative Nick Kupper (R-LD25) has made headlines by seeking a second job to supplement his income. On social media platforms LinkedIn and X, Kupper revealed the challenges he faces as a state lawmaker, citing a modest salary of approximately $35,000 alongside per diem. He expressed his predicament after being laid off from his previous job upon taking office.

In an X post, Kupper candidly stated, “If you’re wondering, state reps make ~$35k with base pay/per diem. Once I got elected I was laid off for being a legislator. That sucks, but I’d rather go bankrupt than give up on my constituents. That being said, four kids eat a lot, so if you know of any remote jobs I’m all ears.”

His LinkedIn message echoed that sentiment, highlighting the limited financial reward of his role: “My role as State Rep is great, but pays very little and timing-wise effectively only allows me to work remote roles.” This appeal underscores the financial struggles faced by many legislators in Arizona, where the state legislature is typically viewed as a part-time commitment.

The operating schedule of the legislature, running from January to as late as June or July, reflects a national trend. States like Texas also have limited legislative sessions, convening for only 140 days every odd-numbered year without special sessions called by the Governor.

Salary comparisons reveal Arizona ranks 24th among the states with its base pay. For instance, New Mexico’s legislators earn no salary, relying solely on a per diem during sessions, while New York’s lawmakers command salaries nearing $110,000 annually, significantly higher than Arizona’s compensation.

The recent proposal, Senate Concurrent Resolution 1003, aims to increase Arizona legislators’ salaries to $48,000, along with enhanced per diem payments. This measure has sparked controversy, particularly regarding inequities in pay based on legislators’ residency within or outside Maricopa County.

Representative David Livingston (R-LD28) voiced concerns, stating, “I think there’s discrimination happening currently (with) the way members of this body and Senate are paid.” His remarks highlight the growing frustration regarding pay discrepancies among legislators living in different areas of the state.

Moreover, Senator John Kavanagh (R-LD3) has proposed linking legislative salaries to inflation, referencing data dating back to 1998. He noted, “We’re not asking the voters to really in real dollars increase our pay. We’re asking them to keep our pay at the same real dollar amount that they thought it was worth in 1998.”

This legislative pay reform has passed through the Senate and the House Appropriations Committee, next heading for a vote on the House floor and potentially presenting itself to voters in November.

Matthew Holloway is a senior reporter for AZ Free News. Follow him on X for his latest stories or email tips to Matthew@azfreenews.com.