Connect with us

democracy

Jane Andersen Takes a Stand to Defend Democracy

Published

on

twitter

In the aftermath of allegations surrounding electoral fraud in the 2020 and 2022 elections, Jane Andersen has stepped into the role of Arizona state director for Mormon Women for Ethical Government (MWEG). This nonprofit, established by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, aims to advocate for democracy through nonpartisan and peacemaking methods. Recently, Andersen shared insights about her organization and its initiatives during an interview with the Arizona Capitol Times.

MWEG began as a small Facebook group of women expressing discomfort with political developments that contradicted their principles. This community grew rapidly, currently boasting around 8,000 members nationwide, with approximately 300 in Arizona. Andersen, who has been involved since the group’s inception, emphasizes a commitment to building a politically active community of women grounded in ethical standards. The membership is diverse, including Republicans, Democrats, and independents.

MWEG has focused on empowering women through media literacy initiatives and encouraging principled voting. They have created programs to teach members how to express their political voices confidently. In light of the national political climate, MWEG led a campaign aimed at fostering hope locally, highlighting the importance of grassroots efforts in the face of broader national issues.

Reflecting on the recent elections, Andersen noted that while she anticipated Trump’s success due to financial backing, she was troubled by the rhetoric involved. Having served as a poll chaplain in south Phoenix, she witnessed firsthand the complex interactions voters had on Election Day, which shaped her understanding of the electoral climate. Concerns about dehumanizing language and its impact on marginalized communities are at the forefront of MWEG’s mission.

While MWEG operates separately from the Church, Andersen finds her faith significantly influences her political perspectives. She advocates for collaborative politics that emphasize listening and compromise, contrasting this with what she perceives as divisive leadership styles. The organization stresses the importance of integrity, compassion, and service in public service, principles that she feels are lacking in current political discourse.

In response to growing political divisiveness, Andersen believes her role involves promoting constructive dialogue. Within congregational settings, members regularly interact with those holding differing views, which fosters skills necessary for bridging divides. She underscores that conflict can be an opportunity for learning, encouraging MWEG’s membership to engage in difficult conversations.

On the topic of election integrity, Andersen expressed concern over the lingering effects of the election denial narrative, noting how it influences public trust in institutions. While she identifies as a conservative Republican, she challenges the uncritical acceptance of ideas that undermine democratic foundations. Acknowledging individuals like Stephen Richer, who stood for integrity in the electoral process, she calls for a collective effort from all parties to reinforce trust in democracy.

Recent recognition from former Governor Jan Brewer, who praised Andersen’s role as a builder of confidence in electoral integrity, holds significant meaning for her. It validates her commitment to upholding democratic principles amidst partisan pressures. Andersen emphasizes that protecting democratic institutions requires collaboration across political affiliations, stating that integrity must serve as a common ground for all.

Looking ahead, Andersen plans to direct MWEG’s focus towards state-level issues, such as immigration reform and addressing systemic racism. She is eager to establish a stronger lobbying presence and to collaborate with organizations committed to bipartisan governance. She hopes to inspire legislators to prioritize civic virtues that address the needs of Arizona’s diverse population, engaging the “exhausted majority” seeking effective representation.