Yavapai College Chairwoman Silences Board Debate in a Controversial Move

Deb McCasland has been reelected as chairwoman of the Yavapai Community College Governing Board following a contentious meeting on January 14, where her leadership ability was challenged by newly-elected board member Bill Kiel. The vote concluded with a narrow 3-2 margin, with McCasland having effectively stifled Kiel’s inquiries regarding her qualifications.

Kiel, representing District 1, proposed District 3 member Toby Payne for the chair position. In contrast, District 5 representative Steve Bracety nominated McCasland, who serves District 2, covering communities like Camp Verde and Prescott’s outskirts. Bracety commended McCasland’s qualifications, citing her national awards as an outstanding trustee.

Payne, during his nomination remarks, expressed support for the college’s current president, Dr. Lisa Rhine. However, Kiel highlighted concerns from District 3 residents regarding their perceived inequities in funding and representation. “Having a District 3 member as chair would show goodwill to a community that feels unsatisfied,” he emphasized, noting that no representative from District 3 has held the position in 15 years.

Tension During Discussion

As the meeting progressed, tensions escalated. Kiel attempted to address a past interaction with McCasland but was repeatedly interrupted. “That is not important,” she interjected during his questioning, which led to confusion and further conflict among board members. Lynne Adams, the board’s attorney, insisted Kiel focus on the merits of Payne’s nomination instead of questioning McCasland.

Ultimately, the board voted on McCasland’s reelection, which she celebrated by asserting her position as the board’s spokeswoman. This declaration stirred further debate about her leadership style and board dynamics.

Consultant’s Guidance

The meeting also included a session led by consultant Ken Burke, who reminded board members of their limited authority. “You have no authority to change anything at the college,” he emphasized. Burke cited Arizona law, stating governance rests with the board, which cannot delegate its powers carelessly. He further directed board members to approach the president for inquiries to maintain operational efficiency.

In a turn of discussion, Kiel raised concerns about a recent policy restricting board member communication with college employees. He argued that such a rule contradicts their duty as elected officials. Rhine defended the policy, noting it ensures the integrity of communication channels within the college.

Kiel’s challenges to the new policy revealed a growing discomfort within the board regarding transparency and representation. “We all swore an oath to uphold the Constitution,” he stated, highlighting potential legal implications of suppressing free speech among constituents.

As discussions unfolded, the board remained divided, with former president David Borowsky supporting the public-comment-only approach. However, Kiel expressed frustration over McCasland’s handling of the meeting, pointing out that interruptions hinder productive dialogue.