Warning Signs on the Horizon for Hotels Sheltering Homeless Individuals

Arizona lawmakers passed a controversial measure on May 6, mandating that hotels display warning signs when they accommodate homeless guests. While proponents argue this informs families about potential risks, opponents deem it dehumanizing.

House Bill 2803 requires that red signs be placed at all entrances and exits of hotels and motels. These signs will inform guests that the facilities provide housing for the homeless and recommend keeping doors locked and reporting any health or safety concerns.

Guests will receive this notification upon check-in, and the same message will appear on booking websites. Should guests object, they are entitled to a full refund.

Sen. Mitzi Epstein criticized the legislation as offensive, claiming it portrays homeless individuals as criminals. “We are tired of our elected officials assuming someone is a criminal because they don’t have a home,” she stated.

In contrast, Sen. John Kavanagh cited statistics showing that a significant percentage of homeless individuals struggle with substance abuse and mental illness. “We need to consider ordinary citizens who might be exposed to those struggling with serious issues,” he argued.

Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp supported the measure, emphasizing the right of citizens to be informed about their surroundings. However, critics argue the bill overlooks the reasons why some cities house the homeless in hotels, often as a necessary last resort.

Democratic Sen. Lauren Kuby noted that temporary housing in hotels can offer more amenities than shelters, such as ADA compliance and safety for domestic violence victims. Sen. Analise Ortiz contended that the measure addresses symptoms rather than the root causes of homelessness.

Ortiz highlighted a lack of funding and resources aimed at combating homelessness, criticizing the failure to address zoning regulations that could facilitate affordable housing development. She stated that HB2803 is a misguided approach to a complex issue.

Rep. Theresa Hatathlie raised questions about whether the legislation unfairly targets hotels willing to address the homeless crisis. Kuby added that the requirement for signage might violate the First Amendment by compelling speech from private entities.

The discussion surrounding mental health also surfaced, with Kavanagh suggesting that many homeless individuals might not be on the streets if facilities for the seriously mentally ill were available. He acknowledged the shortcomings of past institutional care but highlighted the need for better solutions.

The Senate vote, which passed 17-11 along party lines, follows a narrow House approval of 31-26. The measure will now be sent to the governor for consideration.