Tucson’s Plea: Let Wadsack’s Federal Case Unfold for the Sake of Truth

The city of Tucson is facing pressure over its attempts to dismiss a conspiracy lawsuit filed by former state Senator Justine Wadsack. Critics argue that rather than seeking dismissal, the city should bring Wadsack to court for a lengthy examination.

Wadsack’s claim stems from a traffic citation for speeding—71 mph in a 35 mph zone. She contends this is an instance of political persecution, particularly after losing her seat to Vince Leach in the 2024 Republican primary.

Ironically, the incident gained notoriety partly due to coverage from the Tucson Sentinel. Wadsack has accused the outlet of unfair reporting, yet all she had to do was acknowledge the violation straightforwardly. Instead, she has opted for a 20-page lawsuit reiterating her claims.

City Attorney Mike Rankin has dismissed the lawsuit as “ridiculous,” while city lawyers label it a “political charade.” Despite the general consensus that the lawsuit lacks merit, some believe it should proceed. Engaging Wadsack in a courtroom setting could expose inconsistencies and reveal underlying truths.

Political movements often rely on misinformation, with deceit becoming a cornerstone of narratives aimed at undermining democratic processes. The spread of falsehoods can drain public trust and complicate civic engagement.

In a courtroom, however, the mechanics change. Witnesses cannot evade tough questions or rely on partisan support to shield them from accountability. Past lawsuits by failed candidates illustrate the pitfalls of such narratives collapsing under scrutiny.

Wadsack’s own GOP allies appear to be distancing themselves, questioning her claims and fundraising abilities. Amidst this backdrop, Wadsack has set a fundraising goal of $75,000 but only managed to raise $1,000 in over a week.

Despite skepticism regarding her lawsuit, many argue that a fair hearing is warranted. The allegations warrant examination to clarify whether her claims of targeted prosecution hold any weight.

In her attempts to invoke legislative immunity, Wadsack faced legal setbacks when a judge dismissed those defenses as absurd. Now, she seeks to absolve herself of the ticket by offering proof of participation in a driving course and car insurance.

Her assertion that taxpayers owe her $8 million due to targeted prosecution should be thoroughly investigated. If the Tucson Police Department is indeed engaging in questionable practices, this would represent significant news. Given the current climate, it’s essential to challenge the narratives around accountability and governance.

In the end, Wadsack has elevated her situation to a federal matter. Engaging with the truth, even through rigorous questioning, remains paramount.