Tucson Spends $200k on Rocks to Deter Homeless from Downtown Underpasses

The city of Tucson has allocated $192,107 to install large riprap rocks at the Congress and Speedway interstate underpasses. Officials state the primary motive is pedestrian safety, but activists argue the goal is to displace homeless individuals from the area.

The expenditure included $61,971 on materials such as lighting and boulders from Arizona Electric Supply LLC and Arizona Materials LLC, and $130,135 on labor.

City officials indicated that the initiative was driven by a request from the Arizona Department of Transportation to enhance pedestrian safety at the intersections, given that freeway areas fall under state jurisdiction.

“The state of Arizona has posted no trespassing signs. Their concern is pedestrian safety due to cars potentially jumping curbs, exhaust buildup, and previous incidents involving traffic signals and bus stops,” said city spokesman Andy Squire. “The rocks encourage pedestrians to move through the area safely.”

Activists believe the project aims to displace homeless people during Tucson’s scorching summer months. “It criminalizes the existence of homeless individuals and deprives them of essential shade,” said Community Cares volunteer Liz Casey. “Shaded areas under the overpasses are significantly cooler and taking this away is a major human rights issue.”

Casey and other activists have sought transparency on the project via emails and public records requests. “We were frustrated by the lack of response from city officials,” said volunteer Tate Williams, whose request was fulfilled after nearly two months.

Activists argue that the city’s explanations are insufficient and counterproductive. “Forcing homeless people to move constantly, especially in extreme heat, can jeopardize their safety and access to essential services,” said Casey.

City officials maintain that the rocks were not aimed at targeting specific populations but rather ensuring overall safety. “The underpasses are not suitable for anyone to stay long-term due to high traffic and environmental hazards,” Squire reiterated. “We prefer people to seek better shelter options.”

The heated debate underscores the broader challenge of addressing homelessness in the area. “The city’s spending on this project seems misplaced; the funds could have been better used for more cooling centers,” said Casey.

Although some locals agree with the activists, the city continues its outreach efforts. “We have been connecting people with housing opportunities and will remain committed to that,” Squire said.