Connect with us

Business

Tucson Business Allies Unite to Challenge Prop. 414

Published

on

Tucson biz groups lining up against Prop. 414

Local business organizations have united in opposition to Tucson’s Proposition 414, which proposes a half-cent sales tax increase to enhance funding for police and fire services, as well as programs aimed at reducing homelessness and supporting low-income families.

The upcoming election on March 11 will determine the fate of this proposal, officially dubbed the Safe & Vibrant City Initiative. Voter registration closes on February 10, just before the vote.

The initiative has sparked a fierce debate between business advocacy groups and the city’s leadership, including police and fire unions. Most of the funds would be allocated for public safety enhancements over the next decade.

Concerns among opponents include the potential adverse impact on the Regional Transportation Authority’s half-cent sales tax, which expires next year. If Proposition 414 passes, critics fear it might jeopardize future extensions of this tax.

The Tucson Metro Chamber announced its opposition on January 7, with CEO Michael Guymon stating, “Tucson absolutely needs to address public safety, homelessness, and housing affordability. However, we believe there’s a more effective way that doesn’t increase costs for families and businesses.”

On January 22, the Southern Arizona Leadership Council joined the opposition, agreeing that while public safety measures are crucial, the proposed sales tax hike is regressive and could delay vital infrastructure development.

Likewise, the Tucson Association of Realtors voiced its opposition, pointing to significant economic concerns amid current challenges in housing affordability and inflation. TAR interim CEO Steve Redmond expressed, “Proposition 414 presents significant economic concerns, especially when housing affordability is already challenging many Tucson families.”

The Southern Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has opted for a neutral stance, acknowledging both the initiative’s goals and the economic uncertainties it could impose on vulnerable communities.

Details of Prop 414 reveal it could generate approximately $80 million annually over ten years, distributing funds for public safety, affordable housing, and addiction treatment programs. Intended allocations include $246 million for first responders’ capital investments, $182 million for additional personnel, and $140 million for affordable housing initiatives, among others.

Supporters from the business sector, such as Tucson Mayor Regina Romero, highlight the necessity of the proposition to enhance community safety and address homelessness. Romero stated this initiative directly responds to community needs for increased police presence and affordable housing solutions.

Pat DeConcini, managing partner of the real estate firm 4-D Properties, is steering the pro-414 campaign. He claims the proposal will boost police and fire services while addressing homelessness, which has become a growing concern for local businesses. “Survey data shows that homelessness and crime are major concerns. We must take action now,” he insisted.

The measure has generated polarizing opinions, not only within the business community but also among Tucson’s residents. Early ballots are set to be mailed to voters on February 12, making the weeks leading to the election critical for both supporters and opponents alike.