Tempe Faces Backlash Over Misleading Claims on Homelessness Initiatives

Hugh Hallman, a long-time resident of Tempe and former city councilman and mayor, has responded to recent commentary criticizing the city’s approach to homelessness. In a rebuttal, Hallman challenges claims made by Diana Simpson of the Virginia-based Institute For Justice, who depicted Tempe as a city indifferent to charitable efforts and hostile toward those assisting the homeless.

Hallman refutes Simpson’s portrayal as a misrepresentation, labeling it as “fiction.” He emphasizes that Tempe has invested significant resources—$72 million last year—into programs designed to support the homeless population and expand affordable housing. The city has opened a temporary shelter and enhanced its outreach efforts, engaging with 100 to 150 individuals experiencing homelessness each week.

Recent data indicates the efficacy of these initiatives. Tempe’s homeless population has decreased by 34% this year, following a 32% decline last year. Over 1,600 individuals have been assisted in transitioning to shelters, demonstrating a commitment to addressing the root causes of homelessness.

The discussion surrounding Austin Davis, a Scottsdale resident providing informal aid to the homeless, has also come under scrutiny. Simpson’s commentary highlighted Davis’s legal troubles, framing them as a consequence of his charitable efforts. However, Hallman argues that Davis’s methods lack structure and compliance with city regulations, creating safety and health concerns during his gatherings.

Hallman points out that Davis has consistently failed to secure necessary permits while hosting large events, leading to issues such as litter, drug use, and disturbances in neighborhoods near these gatherings. He describes Davis’s activities as poorly managed and detrimental to the community, despite the presumed good intentions.

Attempts by the city to engage Davis in more productive partnerships, including hosting events at shelters, have reportedly been rebuffed. Hallman stresses that the city has not barred Davis from feeding the homeless but has instead sought compliance with safety regulations.

Davis’s situation escalated when he allegedly refused to vacate a park after hours, leading to a series of citations and ultimately his arrest for trespassing. Hallman underscores that Davis’s experiences are not indicative of a broader system working against charitable initiatives.

Hallman contends that the city seeks to maintain safe and clean public spaces while addressing homelessness effectively. He states that enabling poorly regulated charitable actions can hinder genuine efforts aimed at recovery and stability for vulnerable populations.

In closing, Hallman calls for a clearer understanding of Tempe’s efforts and the complexities surrounding homelessness. He asserts that Simpson’s depiction fails to acknowledge the city’s comprehensive strategies to support individuals in need and improve community safety.

Hugh Hallman has a long history of civic involvement in Tempe, serving on the city council and as mayor while founding various local organizations aimed at strengthening community ties.