Supreme Court Streamlines Path for ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Claims in Ohio Employment Case

WASHINGTON — A unanimous Supreme Court has simplified the process for filing lawsuits related to reverse discrimination. This decision favors Marlean Ames, an Ohio woman who alleges she was overlooked for a promotion and subsequently demoted due to her heterosexuality.

The ruling has significant implications for litigation across 20 states and the District of Columbia. Previously, courts set a higher standard for majority group members, including whites and heterosexual individuals, seeking legal recourse for discrimination under federal law.

Ames has served over 20 years with the Ohio Department of Youth Services. She contends that both the promotion she sought and her existing position were awarded to LGBTQ individuals instead of her.

The case revolves around Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. Initial rulings by a trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals were not in her favor.

Previously, the 6th Circuit required plaintiffs like Ames to demonstrate “background circumstances,” which could include evidence that decision-makers were from the LGBTQ community or statistical data indicating systemic discrimination against majority group members.

The appeals court pointed out that Ames did not provide such evidence. However, the Supreme Court’s latest ruling paves the way for clearer avenues for individuals alleging reverse discrimination.