Sheriff Nanos Accuses Challenger Lappin of Funding Inmate for Exclusive Report

In a significant turn of events, Republican challenger Lt. Heather Lappin has been suspended from her role at the Pima County Jail amid allegations of unethical conduct involving a journalist. Sheriff Chris Nanos announced the suspension, claiming Lappin “colluded with a journalist” to facilitate a payment to an inmate in exchange for a news story, as reported in a news release on Tuesday.

The Green Valley News first disclosed that Lappin, a commander with 19 years of experience, was placed on paid administrative leave on Monday. Sources indicated that the journalist from the Arizona Luminaria has been linked to the controversy. Arizona Luminaria, in a statement issued later, denied any wrongdoing, asserting, “We do not and would never pay for sources, interviews or information.”

Following the sheriff’s claims, the Luminaria detailed the situation, explaining a reporter reimbursed an inmate for a phone call made from the jail, highlighting the high costs of such communications. A receipt shared indicated a total reimbursement of $24.99, including fees.

Nanos has called for an investigation by both the Arizona Attorney General’s Office and the FBI, citing potential breaches of state and federal laws, as well as Pima County policies. He stated, “Information available shows that Lt. Lappin colluded with a journalist to facilitate payment to an inmate in exchange for a news story,” raising serious concerns regarding jail operations.

In addition to Lappin’s suspension, Sgt. Aaron Cross has also been placed on leave due to inappropriate campaigning while in uniform, which Nanos stated violates policies against using official attire for political actions. Another unnamed deputy has reportedly faced similar disciplinary measures.

As the situation unfolds, early voting for the upcoming election has already begun, adding urgency to the matter. Sheriff Nanos emphasized the importance of maintaining integrity, stating, “Even the appearance of impropriety must be treated as a critical issue.” The ethical implications of compensating sources for information are a serious concern in journalism, and the Society of Professional Journalists strongly discourages such practices, labeling it “checkbook journalism.”

Amid rising tensions, Nanos reflected on the challenge of addressing such issues during campaign season. Despite potential backlash, he affirmed, “Holding you accountable is not retaliation.” He elaborated on the need to ensure public confidence in law enforcement, especially as allegations of misconduct arise.

Lappin and her attorney have denounced the actions taken against her as retaliatory, potentially infringing on her rights. “If members are facing retaliatory investigations or administrative leave for protected speech activities, these actions would be unconstitutional,” her attorney remarked, asserting a commitment to challenge the sheriff’s decisions when appropriate.

With the upcoming election looming, the ramifications of these suspensions could significantly influence both the sheriff’s race and perceptions of accountability within the Pima County Sheriff’s Department.