Senator Introduces Controversial Bounty for Capturing Illegal Immigrants

On February 20, Arizona lawmakers advanced legislation aimed at imposing a fee on money transfers made by individuals without legal status in the U.S. The bill proposes to reward individuals for reporting these cases, with the funds generated by the new remittance fee then allocated to a newly established Arizona Deportations Fund.

Senator Jake Hoffman, the architect of Senate Bill 1111, argues that the measure addresses economic fairness for legal residents. “Hundreds of millions of dollars are being sent out of our economy to the economies of foreign nations by those who are in this country illegally,” he stated, emphasizing the economic repercussions of illegal money transfers.

The Senate Government Committee approved SB1111 with a narrow 4-3 vote, amid contention from some lawmakers. Senator Flavio Bravo expressed concerns regarding the socioeconomic impact on families supporting relatives abroad, stating, “If people have worked hard and earned this money, I don’t see anything wrong with supporting loved ones overseas.”

Hoffman countered that such financial support to foreign nations undermines the welfare of the state. He noted that the bill aims to mitigate the estimated $1.9 billion sent to Mexico annually by those in the country illegally. The proposed fee entails a $25 charge for wiring amounts up to $500, with larger transfers incurring additional costs.

The anticipated revenue from this fee could reach approximately $30 million each year, earmarked for law enforcement agencies that participate in deporting individuals confirmed to be in the country illegally. This component of the bill garnered criticism, particularly from Noah Schramm of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, who argued that it creates a financial incentive for law enforcement to prioritize immigration enforcement over public safety.

Democratic Senator Lauren Kuby highlighted that those without legal status paid significant taxes, noting $766 million in contributions. Hoffman acknowledged this but stressed the greater issue of funds leaving the state. He argued that the legislation will reinvest extracted funds into local communities and discourage remittances to foreign countries.

Kuby condemned the bill as discriminatory, suggesting it could lead to racially motivated policing practices. However, Hoffman maintains that the bill does not alter existing law enforcement guidelines. He insists it is a method to redirect funds currently flowing outside Arizona back into the local economy.

As the measure has garnered considerable opposition, including from Governor Katie Hobbs, its future remains uncertain. Hobbs’ aides have indicated that she is unlikely to endorse the bill, fueling partisan debates over immigration policy and public safety in Arizona.

In summary, SB1111 stands at the intersection of immigration law, economic policy, and public safety. The forthcoming discussions will likely revolve around its implications for community dynamics and the rights of individuals, regardless of their immigration status.