Sen. Justine Wadsack’s Speeding Trial Postponed as Tucson Judge Steps Down

Arizona State Senator Justine Wadsack, representing the local Republican party, has received a temporary delay in her upcoming trial regarding a criminal speeding incident. A judge overseeing the case has recused herself, pushing the trial originally set for October 28 to a new pretrial conference on October 29 at 1:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Lisa Surhio.

The legal troubles began when Wadsack was stopped by Tucson police on March 15, 2023, for allegedly driving over 70 mph on Speedway—a 35 mph zone—without proof of insurance. Observations made by a police officer on DUI patrol led to her citation for driving at a speed significantly beyond the legal limit.

At her initial court appearance, Wadsack’s attorney entered a not guilty plea on her behalf, claiming political motivations behind the citation. This assertion follows the July report from the Tucson Sentinel detailing her speeding incident. Wadsack reportedly stated she was attempting to rush home due to her electric vehicle’s low battery charge when pulled over.

The officer noted that she immediately identified herself as a senator, which delayed the issuance of her citation due to legislative immunity, a legal principle that protects lawmakers from arrest during sessions. Though the state legislature ended its session on June 15, Wadsack’s refusal to sign the citation led to a summons being filed against her.

Under Arizona law, exceeding the speeding limit by more than 20 mph is classified as a class 3 misdemeanor, carrying penalties of up to 30 days in jail, probation, fines, and points against a driver’s license. As her case progresses, Wadsack has accused city officials of “political persecution” and highlighted her legal team’s efforts to gather evidence to dismiss the speeding charge.

Wadsack has publicly claimed that the lack of radar evidence supports her stance that she is being unfairly targeted. At a local radio show appearance, her attorney asserted that no documentation exists to substantiate the speed measurement made by the officer. This contrasts with police reports indicating the use of radar during the traffic stop.

During the courtroom proceedings, various individuals appeared to address their legal issues, while Wadsack listened quietly. Afterward, she maintained her innocence and expressed confidence in the judicial process. In addition to the speeding charge, she faces a civil violation for not providing valid proof of insurance.

Wadsack’s legal representative stated that they intend to file a notice of claim against the city, seeking depositions from local leaders, including Tucson’s mayor and police chief. He emphasized concerns about the political motivations behind the charges, suggesting that the case could reveal deeper issues within local governance.

Despite her ongoing legal challenges, the city attorney clarified that the prosecution is based solely on the facts of the case, not on political affiliations or positions. Wadsack’s situation has sparked discussions about legislative immunity and the responsibilities of lawmakers while on duty, further complicating her defense as she prepares for her next court appearances.