Residents Weigh In: 2025 Budget Survey Sparks Community Dialogue

In a recent budget survey conducted in the city of Sedona, residents overwhelmingly indicated opposition to new spending on various staff and council initiatives, including the construction of additional roads and a proposed creekwalk. Out of 854 responses, it was clear that most residents favor fiscal restraint.

Survey Outcomes

When asked about future funding for the police department, the most support was for hiring an emergency manager, receiving a score of 954. In contrast, plans to hire additional patrol officers garnered 801 votes, while the position of a homelessness officer ranked lowest at 453.

The allocation of funds for building neighborhood street connections also sparked debate. A significant 56% of respondents supported no funding, while 11% backed $1 million, 9% supported $1.6 million, and 23% favored $2.4 million. Current projections for the budget include $1,166,420 dedicated to neighborhood connections for the upcoming fiscal year.

Regarding a potential new crossing over Oak Creek, the estimated cost stands at $20 million. Only 17% of respondents supported this full expenditure, while 60% rejected any funding for the project entirely. Comparatively, a National Community Survey released in February showed 65% support for a new Oak Creek crossing among a broader audience.

Interest in funding for the proposed creekwalk was minimal; 75% voted against any allocation, with only 8% supporting a $20 million budget. Additionally, the community showed hesitation regarding expenditure for land acquisition targeting workforce housing, with 66% voting against any financial commitment.

Overall priority rankings from fewer than half of the survey respondents highlighted neighborhood connections as the top priority, followed by increasing police presence, whereas the creekwalk initiative received minimal interest.

Community Feedback

Comments from residents reflected a desire for more bike-friendly initiatives instead of increased spending on infrastructure. Some expressed frustration with city staffing levels, questioning the necessity of additional hires amidst existing financial concerns. Several respondents emphasized the importance of local hiring practices and the need for accountability regarding city expenditures. Others called for action on the housing situation, stressing that the current plans do not meet local needs.

Residents expressed skepticism over proposals like workforce housing, questioning their practicality within city limits. Others warned against the threat of homelessness increasing in Sedona, cautioning that unchecked growth and tourism could ultimately undermine local governance.

Overall, feedback indicated a strong preference for prioritizing essential community projects while curtailing unnecessary expenditures. Residents voiced an array of concerns, reflecting a community increasingly wary of spending habits and focused on sustainable, practical solutions.

The complete survey results can be accessed here.