Proposition 139: A “Red Wave” Carrying Innocent Blood Unfolds

By Tiffany Benson |

The recent vote on Proposition 139 in Arizona has sparked intense discussion, particularly among Christians and pro-life advocates. With over 1.9 million votes in favor of abortion on demand, and 1.2 million opposing, the outcome has raised questions about the impact of faith-based leadership on political engagement.

Some argue that spiritual leaders have historically advised their congregations to avoid political issues, claiming a divine oversight. The stark contrast in the voting numbers highlights a worrying lack of mobilization among pro-life supporters. In essence, reaching just 800,000 additional voters could have altered the result significantly.

This situation serves as an indictment for the Church in Arizona. A pressing question emerges: What role are churches playing in such critical societal debates? Engaging congregations in discussions about Proposition 139 should have been imperative for any minister committed to pro-life values. The responsibility to educate and act upon moral issues lies heavily upon them.

One notable effort saw a minister rally 700 colleagues against Prop 139, indicating that some leaders are making strides to bridge the gap. However, these initiatives appear insufficient in the face of overwhelming public sentiment. The silence of many pastors can be attributed to fears surrounding political repercussions or the potential loss of tax-exempt status, leading to a concerning disconnect between faith and civic duty.

It is crucial to clarify that abortion transcends political rhetoric; it is a moral issue rooted in the sanctity of life. The crux of the matter lies in the fact that labeling abortion as simply a political issue diminishes its profound ethical implications.

Arizona, often characterized as a “purple” state, is undergoing a noticeable shift toward more liberal governance. This transformation is prompting calls for a renewed approach among church leaders to embrace their moral obligations publicly and openly. Rather than encouraging disengagement from the political process, pastors should equip their congregations with the necessary discernment to navigate complex issues.

Both intercession and evangelism must coexist in the quest for societal reformation. The challenges facing the state necessitate a proactive response from those in leadership. It is not enough to maintain traditional engagement when broader moral frameworks are at stake.

Furthermore, the prevalent belief that morality cannot be legislated requires reevaluation. Legislation is inherently an expression of a society’s moral compass. It raises the vital question of whether society’s laws should reflect divine principles or human constructs. The implications are dire, as they significantly influence societal direction.

As Christians and pro-lifers reflect on Proposition 139, the challenge remains to transform compassion into action. The future of Arizona and the ethics surrounding life are at a crossroads, necessitating an urgent response from faith leaders and their communities.

Tiffany Benson is the Founder of Restore Parental Rights in Education. Her insights on education, politics, and Christian faith are available on Parentspayattention.substack.com and Bigviewsmallwindow.com.