Phoenix PD Revamps Use of Force Policy for Clarity and Accountability

The Phoenix Police Department has unveiled a new use-of-force policy following nearly two years of revisions and community input. This updated policy aims to provide clearer guidelines on when force is appropriate, emphasizing the importance of building trust between police and the community.

Interim Police Chief Michael Sullivan stressed the necessity of this update, stating that it establishes a clearer framework for officers to follow. The revision introduces key terms such as “necessary” and “proportional” to the existing standard of “reasonable.” This amendment aims to ensure that officers only utilize force that is both appropriate and justified in any given situation.

The newly adopted policy mandates that police personnel “shall use only the force that is objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional.” Furthermore, it delineates officer responsibilities throughout all phases of a force encounter.

Some aspects of the new guidelines are intentionally stricter than those dictated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor. Notably, the policy requires mandatory reporting for all use-of-force incidents.

Police officials reported that all personnel engaged in enforcement roles underwent a comprehensive 20-hour training program regarding the new policy. This training process encompassed a year, culminating in a required review session prior to the policy’s implementation.

Community feedback played a significant role in shaping the revised policy, with the department receiving over 800 comments to inform its development. Key modifications include strict criteria on the use of deadly force, which is now only permissible to avert imminent threats of death or serious injury. Officers are no longer permitted to use lethal force against individuals who pose only a risk to themselves or their property.

Despite the intended benefits of the new policy, it has sparked concern among police union representatives. Darrell Kriplean, president of the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, highlighted potential pitfalls. He warned that the emphasis on defining proportionality in the use of force might lead to officer hesitation in crisis situations, undermining their ability to respond effectively.

Kriplean further criticized the policy’s focus on de-escalation, arguing it could backfire and place officers at risk of disciplinary action even when deadly force is justified in the moment. He expressed skepticism regarding the policy’s recommendations, cautioning that they could lead to more significant long-term issues within the department.

As the Phoenix Police Department moves forward with these changes, the ongoing dialogue surrounding police use-of-force practices and officer accountability continues to evolve.