On-Duty Responder Fatalities to Receive Boosted Benefits Under Prop 311

PHOENIX — If passed in November, Proposition 311 will allocate an additional $250,000 to the families of state or local police officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians who lose their lives due to a criminal act while on duty. This benefit supplements existing financial assistance designed to support public safety personnel’s survivors.

The initiative, referred to as the “Back the Blue Act,” is being promoted not only for its monetary advantages but also as a political statement in favor of law enforcement. Proponents argue that it addresses rising public concerns about police conduct, particularly following national protests against police brutality.

Funded by a new $20 surcharge on individuals convicted of crimes, this measure places the financial responsibility away from the general public. Lawmakers estimate the new benefit will cost around $1 million annually but believe it will generate $1.4 million in revenue due to the expected fees from approximately 137,000 convicts, though only half are likely to pay.

In addition to the new payments, the measure calls for increased penalties for those who assault first responders, lengthening prison sentences for such offenses. Despite bipartisan support in the House, only Republican senators backed the measure after a lengthy lobbying effort by police unions.

Surviving family members currently receive full salary replacements, smaller sums for children, and health insurance coverage from the state. Additionally, federal benefits include over $437,000 and funding for their children’s college tuition for a maximum of four years.

Advocates argue that the measure is essential for recruiting more officers as public safety agencies grapple with staffing shortages despite competitive pay and retirement packages. They contend that it is necessary for citizens to express their support for law enforcement amid a backdrop of national dialogue on policing.

Opposition mainly stems from Democratic lawmakers who criticize the funding approach, asserting that it disproportionately impacts low-income individuals already facing financial hardship due to existing court-imposed fees. Former Rep. Athena Salmon raised concerns about the measure fueling inequality, particularly as fees can inflate fines significantly.

Critics have proposed alternative funding sources that wouldn’t impose additional financial burdens on the already overcharged population. State Sen. Lela Alston emphasized the need for sustainable funding without additional fines, expressing support for death benefits but opposition to the funding method.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona also voiced its disapproval, highlighting similar concerns about the proposed fee structure. They warn that adding new financial obligations to a vulnerable segment of the population could exacerbate existing inequities.

Proponents, however, remain steadfast, asserting that Proposition 311 is a crucial step in reinforcing public safety and demonstrating support for law enforcement personnel who face increasing dangers on the job. With the upcoming ballot decision, the debate continues around its broader implications for Arizona’s criminal justice landscape.