Connect with us

Editorials & Opinions

Navigating the Complexity of Close Election Counts

Published

on

Christopher Fox Graham

Election coverage in Verde Valley presents unique challenges, particularly due to the division of Sedona across two counties. Approximately 70% of Sedona is situated in Yavapai County, with the remaining 30% in Coconino County. The smaller Coconino vote can play a pivotal role in tight races, making accurate reporting essential.

Typically, elections are handled by Yavapai County for the entire city. On election night, this jurisdictional split necessitates the aggregation of data from both counties, adding complexity. Reporters often find themselves in communication with candidates or their representatives, who seek real-time updates on the election results, underscoring the anxiety surrounding close outcomes.

In contests specific to county positions, such as for county supervisor, clarity emerges more readily since both counties publish their results autonomously. The initial results of election night, which include early ballots submitted by mail or drop-off, usually represent only a fraction of the total votes—often one-third to one-half. Preliminary results are released around 8 p.m., providing an early glimpse of potential trends, though final outcomes may continue to evolve well into the night, sometimes until as late as 2 a.m.

This year, a notable race unfolded in the Yavapai County District 3 supervisor election. Democrat Nikki Check emerged victorious against Republican Lori Drake. Although Check held an initial lead in early voting, the results remained uncertain until all ballots were accounted for. While some media outlets prematurely declared her the winner, a more cautious approach was taken until the numbers stabilized. Ultimately, Check claimed victory with a margin of 229 votes after defeating fellow Democrat Donna Michaels in the primary by a significant 72% to 28% margin.

Michaels had secured her last election by a narrow margin against Randy Garrison in 2020, leveraging community dissatisfaction with local projects. However, her term was marred by controversies, including attempts to improperly dismiss Planning & Zoning commissioners and a failed promise regarding vaccination distribution during the pandemic. Her tenure was characterized by unmet commitments and increased public scrutiny, culminating in requests for a change.

Check, recognized for her community involvement, offered a promising alternative. The general election showcased a contest of experienced candidates, with either Check or Drake capable of representing District 3 effectively. While Drake garnered support due to her leadership in local education, Check’s connections as mayor of Jerome and her community college role strengthened her candidacy. Despite the district’s Republican lean, Check’s moderate approach won over a significant number of independent voters.

Moving ahead, the community looks to build upon Check’s election as a fresh opportunity for competent leadership in District 3. Voters express optimism for a responsive approach to governance that genuinely serves the diverse needs of Yavapai County residents.