Marsh’s Senate Legacy: A Defiant Stance Against Border Security Initiatives

By Staff Reporter |

In the upcoming November election, Arizonans in Legislative District 4 will have the opportunity to vote against incumbent State Senator Christine Marsh, a Democrat known for her controversial stance on border security. Since taking office in January 2021, Marsh’s tenure has been marked by narrow electoral victories and a record of opposing significant legislative measures aimed at bolstering state border security and supporting law enforcement.

Marsh first entered the legislature after a tight race in 2020, where she won by fewer than 500 votes against Republican Kate Brophy McGee. Despite losing to McGee in the 2018 election by 267 votes, Marsh managed to edge out Nancy Barto in 2022, securing her seat by less than 1,200 votes under new redistricting lines.

Throughout her legislative career, Marsh has consistently voted against policies aimed at strengthening border security. Notable votes include her opposition to SCR 1011, which urged federal action to secure the southern border and complete border wall construction, and her refusal to support funding for a physical border fence in 2022. Additionally, this year she voted against measures that would have empowered state and local law enforcement in immigration enforcement.

The fallout from these decisions has drawn criticism, especially from Republican lawmakers. After Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed SB 1231—legislation aimed at restricting border crossings—Senator Janae Shamp condemned the veto. Shamp claimed it undermined efforts to protect Arizona citizens from border-related crimes, stating, “This veto is a slap in the face to them.”

In another contentious move, Marsh rejected a proposed ballot measure (HCR 2060) that would have given local law enforcement more authority to manage border-related issues. Her pattern of opposing significant border security initiatives has contributed to her reputation as a leading proponent of open-border policies within her party.

Marsh’s views extend beyond legislative action; she has openly discussed her intent to end local law enforcement collaboration with ICE, asserting the importance of more humane treatment for vulnerable communities, particularly LGBTQ+ immigrants. This perspective aligns with her earlier public endorsements of measures aimed at abolishing ICE, raising the stakes for her November campaign.

As she faces Republican challenger Carine Werner, voter sentiment in Legislative District 4 could hinge on issues of border security and law enforcement support. Current district demographics show a slight Republican advantage with 38% registered voters, compared to 27% for Democrats. Voter turnout in the district was notably high in the last election, exceeding state averages, indicating that a robust campaign effort could sway critical votes.

The coming election will not only test Marsh’s incumbency but could also significantly impact the future direction of border policy in Arizona.