Legislature Greenlights Warning Signs for Hotels Housing Homeless Populations

A new bill mandating hotels that serve homeless individuals to post warning signs has garnered significant attention after passing in the Legislature on May 6. House Bill 2803 calls for alerts in red lettering at each entrance, informing visitors of the hotel’s policies regarding homeless accommodations.

In addition to physical postings, hotels will also be required to include similar notices on booking websites, offering refunds to guests who prefer not to stay in facilities with homeless individuals. Supporters argue the bill promotes transparency and consumer awareness.

Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, who introduced the bill, was motivated by cases like that in Scottsdale, where city funds supported hotel rentals for homeless individuals. “This bill does not solve an underlying problem of homelessness, but it informs citizens,” stated Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp, R-Surprise.

Statistics cited by proponents highlight that homeless populations may have higher rates of substance abuse and mental health issues. Some supporters also connected this measure to child safety, with Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, emphasizing the need for protective measures.

Conversely, opponents of the bill argue that the issue of homelessness is multifaceted, encompassing not only those with addiction problems but also vulnerable populations such as domestic violence survivors, veterans, and disabled individuals. Nicole Newhouse, executive director of the Arizona Housing Coalition, pointed out that mixed hoteling can fill vacant rooms while providing safe accommodations for those in need.

“People escaping domestic violence require confidentiality. Hotels offer a non-congregate solution that shelters cannot,” Newhouse said. Contrary to the claims of increased crime, she asserted, hotels housing homeless individuals often have case managers to assist with their needs.

Critics also voiced concerns during the Senate debate. Sen. Lauren Kuby, D-Tempe, noted that mixed housing solutions benefit diverse demographics, particularly seniors and families escaping abuse. Meanwhile, Sen. Analise Ortiz, D-Phoenix, argued that the bill does nothing to tackle the root causes of homelessness and instead perpetuates stigmatization.

Instead of focusing on punitive measures, Ortiz emphasized the need for extensive conversations about low-income housing solutions and resources for service providers. The legislative debate reflects broader tensions surrounding homelessness policy in Arizona.