Capitol Police
Law Enforcement Braces for Potential Post-Election Unrest in D.C.

WASHINGTON — In the wake of the upcoming presidential election, the risk of political violence looms large over the nation’s capital. Security experts have warned that, despite extensive preparations, threats remain substantial as law enforcement strives to prevent a repeat of the January 6 insurrection.
The U.S. Capitol Police, comprising over 2,000 officers, along with federal agencies such as the Secret Service, face increased scrutiny. This year alone has seen a notable uptick in threats against elected officials, including two assassination attempts on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Concerns about the preparedness of these law enforcement agencies have arisen, particularly following a report indicating that the Secret Service requires significant reform to effectively fulfill its responsibilities. This includes ensuring safety during key events, such as the Electoral College certification on January 6 and Inauguration Day on January 20.
Experts believe that potential unrest might escalate post-Election Day, especially if the results are closely contested or subjected to legal challenges. “You can never have 100% security,” noted Javed Ali, an associate professor at the University of Michigan. “There are always gaps or vulnerabilities, and the aim is to minimize risk.”
Darrell M. West of the Brookings Institution echoed these sentiments, citing a rise in extreme rhetoric in the lead-up to the election, which could incite individuals to action. The longstanding refusal of Trump to accept his 2020 election loss and the rhetoric surrounding it has raised concerns about future unrest.
Lawmakers, particularly those outside leadership positions, face significant vulnerability compared to presidential candidates. Unlike high-ranking officials under extensive security, many Congress members lack permanent protection unless specific threats arise.
The challenges of ensuring safety have been underscored by the fact that even the most secure individuals, like Trump, have faced attempts on their lives. Two incidents this summer—one where a man shot at Trump during a rally, and another involving an armed individual near Trump’s golf course—have prompted questions about current security measures.
Additionally, Trump’s ongoing dissemination of false information has heightened tensions, potentially motivating violence against specific individuals, including immigrants. His recent statements suggesting the use of military force against political opponents have alarmed experts and lawmakers alike.
The aftermath of the election may not reveal immediate violence; however, the potential for disruptions remains. West highlighted the likelihood of confusion with election results, especially as mail-in ballots could cause perceptions of voter fraud. Such scenarios could incite unrest among supporters viewing shifts in election outcomes as illegitimate.
Ali suggested that federal law enforcement is likely better prepared now than in 2020, although the risk remains for solitary actors to exploit vulnerabilities. “Lone wolf” attacks could occur without organized movements like the one seen on January 6, he explained.
Despite these concerns, U.S. Capitol Police Inspector General David T. Harper asserted that his agency has made substantial improvements in security protocols since January 6. Reforms and collaborations with various law enforcement agencies aim to enhance protective measures ahead of the transitions of power.
The Secret Service is tasked with leading security preparations for critical events during the election transition, yet its capabilities have been questioned following recent incidents. An independent review criticized the agency for becoming complacent amid rising risks.
District of Columbia officials are closely monitoring any potential threats as Election Day approaches, reaffirming their commitment to ensuring a peaceful transition of power. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser emphasized the city’s dedication to maintaining order and stability throughout this critical period.