Justice Bolick Faces Activist Backlash as Controversy Erupts

Justice Clint Bolick of the Arizona Supreme Court has publicly responded to a formal complaint filed by Save Our Schools Arizona (SOSAZ) with the Commission on Judicial Conduct. The complaint stems from comments made during a campaign event ahead of the 2024 retention election. Bolick’s succinct rebuttal? “Bring it on.”

SOSAZ alleges that Bolick’s remarks at a politically charged event, where he appeared alongside a cardboard cutout of Donald Trump, compromise the independence and integrity expected from a judicial figure. According to the group, his statement about continuing to “fight for conservative principles” violates the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct, which emphasizes judges’ obligation to uphold public confidence in their impartiality.

Executive Director Beth Lewis articulated SOSAZ’s position, stressing that judges must maintain impartiality at all times. “Bolick has politicized the courts,” she stated, suggesting his rulings have adversely affected public education funding in Arizona.

In a recent tweet, Lewis expressed her frustration about casting a vote against Bolick, citing his influence on decisions that undermined educational resources. SOSAZ is actively campaigning for the removal of Bolick and fellow Justice Kathryn King, both subject to retention votes this cycle. Despite this, reports from the Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review indicate that both justices have received favorable evaluations regarding their judicial decisions.

Bolick, in his response to the complaint, defended his right to free speech as a judge. He emphasized that while judges are indeed restricted in their public expressions, they retain the right to address unfounded accusations and participate in partisan events, provided they do not endorse candidates. “I have been a registered independent for more than two decades,” he noted, distinguishing himself from typical partisan affiliations.

He further remarked on the nature of the critique he faces, indicating that his decisions have drawn criticism from both conservative and liberal factions. Bolick described the complaint as politically motivated rather than grounded in genuine judicial ethics, calling it an “abuse of process.” In closing, he expressed hope that the issue would continue beyond the election, aiming to establish a legal precedent for judges’ rights to defend their integrity.

Contact: Matthew Holloway, reporter for AZ Free News