Brian Sigritz
Fed Rate Cuts: A New Dawn for State and Local Government Borrowing Opportunities

The Federal Reserve’s recent interest rate cuts are set to impact not just individual borrowers but also state and local governments across the country.
With the Fed’s key rates now ranging from 4.5 to 4.75%, officials anticipate that lower borrowing costs will facilitate housing development, increase tax revenues, and improve financing for essential infrastructure projects, including roads and water systems.
This cut followed a prolonged period of rate hikes aimed at combating inflation, which has now eased to 2.7%. Economists are forecasting a further reduction in rates by December.
According to Liz Farmer from The Pew Charitable Trusts, lower interest rates could improve stock market returns historically. This trend may bolster pension portfolios heavily invested in equities, leading to better financial outcomes for these funds.
As borrowing costs decline, states and localities could experience a rebound in infrastructure funding, enhanced sales tax collections due to increased consumer spending, and improved pension performance. This is especially pertinent as many states witnessed a significant revenue downturn in fiscal year 2023.
Brian Sigritz, director of state fiscal studies at the National Association of State Budget Officers, noted that over three dozen states faced revenue drops last year, with several projecting budget deficits in the current fiscal year. He maintains, however, that states remain on stable fiscal ground despite these challenges.
Sigritz highlighted the importance of borrowing for infrastructure projects, and the recent rate cuts should ease financial pressures for state budgets, allowing for greater investment in public works.
In Madison, Wisconsin, finance director David Schmiedicke expressed optimism that lower borrowing costs would lead to more competitive bids for construction projects. He noted the city’s ongoing attractiveness for new residents despite previous higher rates.
Conversely, Rebecca Fleury, city manager of Battle Creek, Michigan, emphasized the importance of interest rates on essential municipal services, particularly fire department funding. She noted that fluctuations in revenue streams directly impact the city’s capacity to deliver these services.
Schmiedicke cautioned that while lower rates reduce borrowing costs for projects, they also decrease the interest income localities generate from their cash reserves, presenting a double-edged sword for municipal finances.
In California, H.D. Palmer, deputy director for external affairs, remarked that the state, home to many technology firms, stands to benefit from lower rates due to its progressive tax structure, which helps boost revenues when markets thrive.
The Alabama Department of Finance is monitoring the Fed’s decisions closely, acknowledging that while lower rates could eventually enhance state revenues, immediate impacts may be minimal and will require careful observation of economic indicators.
Wisconsin’s reliance on property taxes adds another layer of complexity for local governments, with Schmiedicke hopeful that renewed development spurred by lower rates could bolster overall property tax bases.
As states confront rising housing costs, lower interest rates may encourage new construction. Fleury mentioned that while developers face high costs for loans, labor, and materials, a drop in interest rates could facilitate more affordable housing projects. However, challenges remain in securing funding for such initiatives.
Despite the potential benefits, affordable housing is a persistent issue. Sigritz noted that state leaders increasingly prioritize housing affordability in their budget proposals, though solutions will not materialize swiftly. The demand for more housing persists, requiring sustained effort from state and local governments.