Ex-Tucson Officer Escapes Indictment in Wheelchair Shooting Case

Pima County prosecutors faced another setback as a grand jury declined to charge former Tucson police officer Ryan Remington in the fatal shooting of Richard Lee Richards, a man in a motorized wheelchair, during a confrontation over alleged shoplifting in November 2021. Pima County Attorney Laura Conover confirmed the grand jury issued a “no bill” on Thursday.

Remington had previously been indicted for manslaughter in August 2022 but pleaded not guilty. That indictment was successfully challenged by his defense team, who argued that misleading statements had been presented during the grand jury proceedings. A second grand jury also declined to indict Remington earlier this year.

As a result of this week’s decision, Conover announced that her office would “close the file” and would not seek further review of the case. The shooting incident occurred while Remington was serving in a special duty assignment as a security guard at Walmart, responding to reports of theft by Richards.

Body-worn camera and surveillance footage revealed Remington trailing Richards through various parking lots as Richards attempted to enter a Lowe’s store. At one point, Remington warned another officer about Richards’ possession of a knife.

As Richards neared the store entrance, Remington fired multiple shots, critically injuring him. The aftermath raised significant concerns regarding adherence to police use-of-force protocols; former Tucson Police Chief Chris Magnus later terminated Remington’s employment, stating he was “deeply disturbed” by his decision to use deadly force.

Richards’ family subsequently filed a lawsuit, claiming that Remington’s actions were unnecessary. They argued that Richards, who had suffered severe injuries from a fall in 1995, posed no real threat. Richard’s sister described the incident, expressing her belief that Remington’s response was excessive.

Remington’s defense attorney, Mike Storie, defended the former officer’s actions, arguing that Richards, despite being in a wheelchair, could still present a threat. The defense suggested that the incident unfolded rapidly, and the officer could not afford to hesitate.

There has been criticism surrounding how Tucson police address situations involving individuals in mobility devices. The protocols for engaging with people in wheelchairs, especially regarding the potential for threatening behavior, have come under scrutiny.

In her post-decision statement, Conover emphasized that the investigation preceding the grand jury’s decision was extensive. She indicated that her office sought consultation from experienced prosecutors and a recognized expert in use-of-force scenarios. Despite the grand jury’s ruling, Conover expressed disappointment, affirming her commitment to seeking justice for Richards.

In the background, another high-profile death incident involving law enforcement also recently concluded, as Conover’s office declined to pursue charges against officers connected to the death of Wade Welch at the Pima County Jail. The complexities surrounding both cases illustrate broader discussions on police practices and accountability within the community.

In summary, the latest developments in the Remington case highlight persistent challenges in evaluating police conduct, particularly incidents involving use-of-force and navigating issues of accountability in sensitive circumstances.