Bill Mandating Hotel Warnings for Renting to Homeless Advances in Legislature

Arizona legislators are advancing a law aimed at ensuring hotel guests are informed if their accommodations also house individuals experiencing homelessness.

The Senate Government Committee approved legislation on March 19 that bars public funding for what Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, refers to as “mixed hoteling.” This practice allows hotels to cater to both paying customers and those requiring temporary shelter due to homelessness.

Under HB2803, affected hotels would be required to place conspicuous signage at all entrances, highlighting the presence of homeless guests. Notably, the signs must feature bold gothic letters in red ink, accompanied by advisories encouraging guests to secure their belongings and report any issues to local law enforcement.

Furthermore, guests must be verbally informed during check-in about the hotel’s dual function and given the option of a full refund should they prefer other accommodations.

Despite the legislation’s support in committee, objections were raised by Jeanne Woodbury of the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence, who argued that the bill unfairly targets hotels that offer emergency shelter for vulnerable populations. “This legislation stigmatizes businesses that provide critical housing solutions,” Woodbury stated.

Katelynn Contreras from the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona cautioned that the bill’s broad definitions could lead to unintended consequences. She pointed out that individuals displaced by natural disasters could also fall under the category of “homeless” as defined by the legislation, obligating hotels to comply with its stipulations.

In response, Gress clarified that his intention is not to address emergency situations stemming from disasters. However, he acknowledged that amendments may be necessary as the bill progresses to the full Senate.

Contreras expressed further concerns about the implications of compelled signage, arguing that it infringes on the rights of private entities and could imply negative stereotypes about homeless individuals.

Gress’s initiative surfaced when he learned that local tax dollars were funding accommodations for the homeless in Scottsdale. He asserts that while there are limited scenarios where such sheltering makes sense, the general practice is problematic. He cited the Windemere Hotel, which Mesa utilizes for its “Off the Streets” program, as an example of the backlash this practice incurs among paying guests.

Reviewers’ feedback on the Windemere Hotel has been mixed. Some comments highlight concerns over safety and cleanliness, while others note that the hotel does not warrant the worst reputations described online.

Gress emphasized that his bill does not prevent hotels from providing shelter but mandates transparency for paying guests. He underscored the importance of notifying guests, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the homeless population often utilizing such services.

Support for the legislation was voiced by Senate members, with some emphasizing the need for consumer protection. “Guests should be informed about the environment they are entering,” noted Sen. John Kavanagh, highlighting the potential risks associated with housing extremely vulnerable populations.

Contrasting opinions emerged, with Sen. Lauren Kuby arguing that the legislation relies on unfounded assumptions. She highlighted the role hotels play in accommodating those with families or pets who cannot access traditional shelters, especially during public health emergencies like COVID-19.

Advocates for the homeless continue to stress the importance of treating all individuals with dignity, emphasizing the need for understanding rather than stigmatization.