Arizona Warns Foreign Agents: Harass Locals and Brace for Tougher Penalties

On June 18, the Senate approved a significant piece of legislation aimed at increasing penalties for individuals tied to foreign governments engaged in intimidation tactics against dissidents in the U.S.

House Bill 2374 mandates that those convicted of crimes such as stalking or harassment while acting as agents of foreign entities face elevated sentencing. Offenses could be reclassified to a higher degree, intensifying the repercussions for such actions.

In addition to stricter penalties, the legislation calls for the Arizona Department of Public Safety to create a Transnational Repression Recognition and Response Training Program. This initiative aims to equip law enforcement with the skills necessary to identify and address transnational repression effectively.

Rep. Quang Nguyen, the bill’s author, expressed his commitment to protect individuals from foreign government intrusions. As a refugee from communist Vietnam, Nguyen is vocal about the real-life implications of government oppression. “No one in Arizona — no one in America — should have to live in fear of harassment,” he stated, emphasizing the need for legal measures against such intimidation.

The bill drew inspiration from recent incidents, notably an FBI operation that uncovered an illegal police station in New York linked to the Chinese government. These activities were believed to target and harass dissidents critical of the regime.

During discussions, Nguyen highlighted the importance of distinguishing traditional crimes from those driven by transnational repression. He believes this legislation could provide clearer insight into the motivations behind certain offenses.

However, not all legislators are in favor. Sen. Analise Ortiz, along with other Democratic senators, raised concerns about potential violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Ortiz argued that the bill could lead to discrimination based on national origin.

Critics worry that such measures may have broader implications, affecting Arizona’s reputation as a welcoming place for businesses and residents alike. Ortiz cited additional legislation, including a recently vetoed measure aimed at preventing Chinese ownership of Arizona land, as indicative of a trend that could harm the state’s economic partnerships.

In response, Sen. Frank Carroll emphasized the legal definitions of foreign adversaries, asserting the necessity of such legislation to safeguard against potential threats. He criticized the framing of the issue as discriminatory, arguing for the essential protective measures outlined in the bill.