House Republicans Move to Overturn Critical Protections for Abortion Clinics and Churches Against Violence

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee has endorsed a Republican initiative aimed at repealing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, which prohibits violence against reproductive health clinics and places of worship. This measure will now move to the full House for a vote.

Originally passed in 1994 following violent attacks on abortion providers, the FACE Act made it a federal crime to obstruct access to reproductive health care services. The law was enacted in response to tragic events, including the assassination of Dr. David Gunn and an attempted murder of Dr. George Tiller.

The act received support from then-President Bill Clinton and has since been crucial in safeguarding abortion clinics and religious institutions from intimidation and violence. Recent political changes, particularly the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade, have reignited debates about the act’s implications. During Donald Trump’s presidency, calls for protests at clinics increased, and his administration even pardoned individuals convicted under the law.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, criticized the current administration, stating that it signals a troubling acceptance of violence against women. His condemnation came during the heated discussion regarding the bill, which ultimately passed on a 13-10 party-line vote.

Texas Rep. Chip Roy introduced House Bill 589, arguing that the FACE Act has been misused, especially in the wake of the Dobbs decision. Roy acknowledged pushback from Trump’s inner circle about the law’s application, saying his intent is to limit politicization rather than exacerbate it.

Debate ensued over the depiction of anti-abortion activists. Roy claimed individuals protesting were unjustly prosecuted, but counterarguments highlighted that some participants had engaged in extreme tactics, such as blockading clinic entrances rather than simply praying.

Statistics from the National Abortion Federation reveal a history of violence against clinic workers, including murders and assaults. Advocates argue that the FACE Act has been instrumental in ensuring safety, with Julie Gonen of the National Abortion Federation describing attempts to repeal it as unconscionable.

Some committee members proposed amending rather than outright repealing the act. Rep. Tom McClintock voiced concerns about misuse but suggested reforms instead of a full repeal.

Republican Rep. Harriet Hageman echoed sentiments about alleged anti-life terrorism, supporting the repeal based on her view that the act has been abused politically. In contrast, Democratic representatives, including Mary Gay Scanlon, warned that repealing the FACE Act would encourage violence and violate individuals’ rights to medical care.