Unmasking Prop 140: The True Forces of Hubris and Power at Play

By the Arizona Free Enterprise Club |

In a significant move, Arizona’s Prop 140 aims to introduce ranked-choice voting and jungle primaries. Advocates argue this initiative could reshape the electoral landscape. However, recent statements have unveiled ulterior motives behind the push.

During a press conference for Prop 140, Kimber Lanning, founder of Local First Arizona, indicated that states adopting these reforms have been able to implement progressive policies, specifically referencing climate initiatives and offering driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants. This revelation raises questions about the genuine intent of ranked-choice voting.

Proponents of Prop 140 claim to promote moderation and inclusivity in government. Yet, the connection between these reforms and progressive agendas, such as climate action and immigration benefits, suggests a departure from the promised moderation.

Notably, substantial funding from liberal billionaires across the nation, particularly Colorado, is fueling the Prop 140 initiative. This financial influx aims to alter Arizona’s political trajectory, steering it towards Democratic dominance through the proposed electoral changes.

The campaign’s undertones reveal a complex narrative. While advocating for new voting systems, the backers may overlook the implications of their actions. The pursuit of power often carries risks of alienation among various voter groups, potentially undermining the very objectives they profess to support.