SUSD Board President Takes Stand Against Banning Sexually Explicit Books from School Libraries

By Mike Bengert |

A recent controversy has emerged within the Scottsdale Unified School District (SUSD) regarding explicit content found in school libraries. A book titled “Push,” housed in an SUSD library, has drawn significant criticism from parents and community members. The excerpts from the book raise pressing questions: Does this literature provide substantial educational or literary value? Would parents be comfortable having their children read such material?

Excerpts depict alarming themes, including sexual abuse and graphic descriptions that many find inappropriate for school settings. As reactions pile up, the core inquiry persists: Should such content even be available to minors in SUSD libraries?

The debate intensified during a board meeting on September 10, where Dr. Hart-Wells, the Governing Board President, responded to a request from a concerned parent. This request, backed by Scottsdale Unites for Education Integrity, sought the removal of certain books deemed inappropriate. Dr. Hart-Wells defended the district’s stance, describing the appeal as stemming from an out-of-state organization with a “super-minority” backing.

Dr. Hart-Wells stated, “I would just like to encourage the super-majority of our community members and taxpayers who are opposed to book bans to request additional information from your neighborhood school and District administration about these efforts.” However, critics counter that her characterization of the community’s sentiments is misleading.

During a public comment period on October 1, I challenged Dr. Hart-Wells’ assertion regarding community support for explicit materials in schools. I emphasized her claim implied a broad agreement within Scottsdale residents, questioning the validity of her “super-majority” reference. My assertion was that the request originated from a local initiative, not an imported political agenda.

This effort requested the removal of books with “pervasively vulgar” content, seeking alignment with Arizona law and SUSD policies. Contrary to Dr. Hart-Wells’ portrayal, the intent was not to impose blanket bans but to ensure educational appropriateness.

Interestingly, a review of the targeted books began following the request, suggesting a conscious effort by the district to assess adherence to legal and policy standards. Critics argue that Dr. Hart-Wells’ public statements undermine this important assessment process.

The heart of the matter lies in whether SUSD’s leadership should prioritize compliance with legal standards or protect the availability of explicit materials. Dr. Hart-Wells seems to favor the latter. Her approach raises questions about her commitment to student welfare amidst rising challenges in academic performance and enrollment.

As union-backed candidates prepare for upcoming board elections, the stakes are high. Parents concerned about the presence of adult-rated materials in school facilities retain the power to influence change. By supporting candidates who align with values centered on educational integrity, safety, and fiscal responsibility, they can impact SUSD’s future.

Mike Bengert is a long-time Scottsdale resident dedicated to enhancing educational quality in SUSD for over three decades.