Kelly & Sinema Must Advance PRESS Act to Safeguard Journalistic Integrity

In a striking intersection of sports journalism and legal challenges, the story of a Tucson Sentinel journalist serves as a reminder of the complexities reporters often face. This journalist, who had previously written a political blog alongside his soccer pieces, received an unexpected subpoena—not from a political figure, but concerning notes related to the University of Arizona soccer team.

Although the situation was resolved without significant hassle, it highlighted the protections afforded by Arizona’s reporter shield law. This law, one of the most comprehensive in the United States, safeguards journalists from having to reveal sources or notes, which is crucial for preserving the integrity of their work.

Nationally, the landscape is less secure. While 49 states provide varying degrees of protection for reporters, a federal shield law remains elusive. Recent cases, such as that of Catherine Herridge, underscore the precarious position of journalists. Herridge faced a federal judge’s order demanding she reveal her sources, leading to contempt charges and daily fines.

The PRESS (Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying) Act, currently stalled in the Senate, aims to address these gaps in protection. If passed, it would prevent federal agencies from compelling reporters to disclose sources or notes under duress, effectively shielding journalists from government surveillance tactics.

This bill’s importance extends beyond protecting reporters; it also safeguards the public’s right to a free and active press. Among its provisions, the act defines journalists broadly, ensuring that those who write for blogs or less traditional outlets are also protected.

Despite facing opposition from some lawmakers, the PRESS Act has garnered bipartisan support in the House and backing from various journalism and civic organizations including the ACLU and the Society of Professional Journalists. U.S. Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema are encouraged to advocate for the bill’s progression, as its passage could fortify journalism’s foundation across the nation.

The urgency for this measure grows, especially with the changing dynamics of Congress. The future of federal protections for journalism hangs in the balance, and timely action is essential to ensure these safeguards do not fall victim to political inertia.