Justine Wadsack’s SpeederGate Scandal Strips Her of Police Backing

State Sen. Justine Wadsack is embroiled in controversy following the Arizona Fraternal Order of Police’s decision to revoke their endorsement after she faced charges for criminal speeding.

The incident, dubbed “SpeederGate,” came to light when Wadsack accused authorities of “political persecution” after being informed she would receive a citation for speeding.

On March 15, police clocked Wadsack driving 71 mph in a 35 mph zone along Speedway. The violation constitutes a class 3 misdemeanor, potentially carrying a 30-day jail sentence, though she likely faced a fine or probation.

In a red 2015 Model S 85, Wadsack was stopped just after 10 p.m. She claimed she was racing to get home with only four miles of battery left in her electric vehicle.

This scenario has raised many questions, given her outspoken stance against environmentally friendly technologies. Additionally, her claim to have residences both in Dove Mountain and the Sam Hughes neighborhood adds another layer of complexity.

The Arizona Constitution protects lawmakers from arrests during sessions, delaying her citation until June 27. Upon receiving the news, Wadsack continued her “political persecution” narrative.

Her conduct drew criticism from law enforcement and former supporters. The Fraternal Order of Police rescinded their support, citing her actions as unbecoming of an elected representative.

Paul Sheldon, president of the FOP, emphasized that her behavior undermined her support for public safety officials. “Attacking police personnel for doing their job is simply unacceptable,” Sheldon stated.

Former Pima County Sheriff Mark Napier also criticized Wadsack’s reaction, suggesting she should have quietly accepted her ticket.

The story gained significant media coverage, drawing widespread attention and sparking political debates.

Wadsack has maintained her innocence, claiming data from her Tesla app would exonerate her. This remains to be seen, as her defense on social media continues to unfold.

Her insistence on political persecution, while promoting her support for fossil fuels and condemning the lack of charging infrastructure, has added to the controversy.

City Attorney Mike Rankin clarified the difference between persecution and prosecution, reinforcing that Wadsack’s actions warranted legal consequences, not political victimization.

The situation has sparked broader discussions about equal treatment under the law, political victimhood, and the intersection of personal accountability and public office.

Wadsack’s claims of political bias have intensified the ongoing debate around law enforcement and media scrutiny, further complicating her political future. The incident serves as a reminder of the expectations and responsibilities placed on elected officials.