AZ Legislature Advances Key Propositions

Editor’s Note: This is the third in a series about the 13 statewide propositions on the November ballot. All but two of the measures were drafted by state lawmakers.

As Arizonans prepare for the Nov. 5 general election, the ballot will feature 11 legislative initiatives. These measures aim to modify court administrative fees, enforce minimum sentencing, and enhance legislative oversight of state agencies, among other changes.

Proposition 311 proposes a new $20 fee for individuals convicted of crimes in Arizona. This fee would supplement existing charges and create a fund providing $250,000 to the families of first responders who perish while on duty. The measure would also escalate the penalties for assaulting a police officer, raising certain offenses from a class 5 felony to a class 4 felony. If offenders injure an officer, penalties could increase further, effective until January 1, 2033.

Proposition 312 offers property owners the ability to seek tax refunds if local governments fail to address public nuisances associated with homelessness. Homeowners and businesses can request refunds by documenting costs linked to illegal activities such as camping and loitering. Critically, the Goldwater Institute touts this measure as a critical solution for taxpayers frustrated with local government inaction. In contrast, the ACLU of Arizona warns that the proposition could lead to increased burdens on unhoused individuals and deteriorate community conditions further.

Proposition 313 focuses on child sex trafficking, proposing life sentences for individuals convicted of related class 2 felonies. Supported primarily by Republican legislators, this initiative seeks to deter trafficking offenses. Proponents highlight the importance of robust sentencing to combat these crimes. However, some, including the League of Women Voters of Arizona, argue that the measure may inadvertently penalize victims coerced by their abusers.

Proposition 315 calls for legislative approval of any state agency regulation projected to cost over $500,000 within five years of implementation, excluding the Arizona Corporation Commission. Proponents assert that this requirement enhances accountability and transparency in government decision-making. However, opponents, including Governor Katie Hobbs, contend that it could impede the efficiency of state agencies and undermine their operational independence.